Alaska Airlines didn’t use the Virgin branding since 2018, however a UK court docket guidelines the American provider ought to pay royalty even 5 years after that.
Virgin America and Alaska Airline grew to become one.This is now getting costly.
Virgin Group final week gained its trademark case in opposition to Alaska Airlines Inc for about USD160 million, with a decide in London ruling that it’s entitled to royalties regardless that the U.S. airline not makes use of the Virgin model.
Virgin items Virgin Aviation TM Ltd and Virgin Enterprises Ltd argued Alaska is liable to pay a roughly $8 million “minimum royalty” fee yearly till 2039.
It mentioned a 2014 trademark licence settlement between Virgin and Virgin America Inc, which was acquired by Alaska’s mother or father firm in 2016, required the annual fee even when Alaska stopped utilizing its branding.Judge Christopher Hancock mentioned in a written ruling on Thursday that the minimal royalty was “a flat fee payable for the right to use the Virgin brand, whether or not that right is taken up”.
A spokesperson for Virgin mentioned Alaska’s acquisition of Virgin America included “a branding agreement lasting until 2039 with clear obligations”, including: “We are pleased the court agreed with our arguments.”
A spokesperson for Alaska mentioned the case is “without merit and we intend to appeal the decision”.
Virgin granted a trademark licence to Virgin America to make use of its model in reference to the operation of a U.S. home airline earlier than Alaska Air Group Inc. accomplished its USD2.6 billion acquisition of Virgin America.
Alaska merged its operations with Virgin America in 2018 and stopped utilizing the Virgin model the next yr. Virgin informed London’s High Court in October that Alaska, because the authorized successor to Virgin America Inc, is obliged to make the annual fee.
The put up Virgin wins USD160 mn in trademark dispute with Alaska Airlines appeared first on Travel Daily.
